|
In challenging the conservative Republican power structure, the
Oregon MNPL began with no money, no voter lists and no experience in
political pamphleteering. However, the Republican-controlled
legislature gave them a good issue in 1953 when it enacted one of
the most restrictive anti-picketing laws in the country. Oregon's
unionists initially viewed the anti-picketing statute as a disaster,
but later realized it was the catalyst needed to ignite a political
turnaround. As a result of the new law a number of Oregon unions
formed a United Labor Committee and targeted one Portland district
for an experiment in political action in the 1954 campaign.
To help elect labor-endorsed candidates for federal and state
offices rank-and-file union members were recruited for such
committees as primary screening, finance, voter registration,
get-out-the-vote, car pool, and "blitz" distribution. Most
of these rank-and-file members had no previous experience in
political campaigning. When some building trades leaders hesitated
to join in, for fear of jeopardizing their cozy arrangements with
the Republican power structure, the IAM representatives decided to
bypass them and go straight to their members. A "blitz"
campaign was unleashed in the final weeks. More than 100 volunteer
crews blanketed 60,000 homes in 330 precincts with brochures and
sample ballots for each of the candidates. Other unionists
distributed some 30,000 pieces of campaign literature outside
factories, stores and public buildings. The outcome not only stunned
the press and politicians but even surprised many union members.
They helped to elect the first Democratic Senator from Oregon in
forty years, the first Democratic candidate to Congress in eighteen
years and the first Democratic labor commissioner ever. By
1956 the IAM was ready for a statewide effort. Early in the campaign
an MNPL Committee sat down with Morse's campaign manager and talked
strategy. Again committees of rank-and-filers were set up throughout
the state. And again hundreds of IAM members and their wives
assembled sample ballots and other pieces of literature, 1,316,000
pieces in all, into packets for distribution crews. Hundreds of
others dropped these packets on more than 135,000 doorsteps,
covering more than 80% of the precincts. McKay realized his
union-busting in Salem would cost him votes in working families.
Seeking to limit the damage, he denied any connection with the
agency, stating he had sold the company to his sons-in-law. The IAM
responded by producing records proving McKay was majority
shareholder when the union was busted. Three weeks before
the election the MNPL and the State Labor Council blanketed the
state with 250,000 fact sheets on the McKay strike. A rank-and-file
member of Local Lodge 1506 penned an eloquent and devastating
account of the strike that was widely read in working class homes.
It began, simply, "This is the story of how Douglas McKay
wrecked our union." It domolished McKay's claim that he had
nothing to do with the wrecking job. "Yes," this worker
said, "McKay was 3,000 miles away in Washington. But I know he
could have saved me fourteen months on the picket line by making
just one phone call. He could have done it by saying just five
words: 'Deal fairly with the union.' Instead he called our leaders
'goons'." In the presidential election of 1956,
Eisenhower swept Oregon together with most of the nation. But the
campaign that began with a small meeting of IAM business
representatives in 1952 paid off, after four years of dedication,
belief and hard work, with what The Machinist called
"Labor's Sweetest Victory." While Eisenhower carried the
state by 77,000 votes, Morse outpolled McKay by 60,000. Oregon was
no longer the Vermont of the West. In addition to Morse, the Oregon
labor movement elected three members of Congress, a Governor, a
Democratic majority in the legislature and a former union president
as mayor of Portland. As the result of that historic 1952 meeting of
a small band of IAM stalwarts, politics in Oregon would never be
quite the same again. The Ivory Tower When
the Grand Lodge moved into the newly constructed Machinists Building
on Mt. Vernon Place in 1920, Journal editor Hewitt described
it as "beautiful and commodious" and "one of the
finest and most modern office buildings in Washington." By the
mid-1950's these quarters were clearly inadequate, too cramped and
crowded for the many more employees needed to serve a far larger
membership. Hallways that may have been considered
"commodious" in 1920 now seemed dark and narrow. Offices
that Hewitt may have thought beautiful became dingy with age. The
once respectable neighborhood declined during the depression and
became rundown and shabby after World War II. As prostitutes and
pimps began to move closer Al Hayes looked around Washington for a
more suitable site. In 1954 Hayes purchased a prime corner lot on
Connecticut Avenue, Washington's most fashionable commercial
thoroughfare. It was with easy walking distance of the White House
and was once the site of the British Embassy. In December,
1954 ground was broken for a new ten-story building and in March
1956, fifteen months later, the staff moved into the new quarters.
Teh new Machinists Building included such amenities as an
underground garage, an auditorium seating 250, a wood paneled
Executive Council room and even softly piped-in music fro
stenographers to type by. Compared with the old building it was
indeed sumptuous and, as expected, some members and even a few
representatives sometimes refer to it as "The Ivory
Tower," usually in jest but often disparagingly. Union-built,
the new headquarters had the lowest construction cost per square
foot of any modern office building in Washington and by the 1980's
was probably worth twenty or thirty times the original cost. Lloyd
Weber--The Spirit of St. Louis The 1956 Grand Lodge
Convention in San Francisco opened on a somber note. Al Hayes
announced that Harvey Brown died that morning. The previous week the
organization was stunned by a loss that far more directly affected
most delegates. Lloyd Weber, long-time chairman of the Law Committee
and veteran directing business representative of District 9, died in
St. Louis. When he succeeded Elmer Walker as directing business
representative. in 1937, District 9 had only 2,500 members. In less
than 20 years Weber built the district into one of the most
vigorous, dynamic and democratic regional labor units in the
country. While he was DBR, Weber acquired a fine headquarter
building in uptown St. Louis, complete with offices, meeting halls
and a tap room. He also pioneered one of the best union-sponsored
health and welfare plans in the union.. Weber grew up in
the "Kerry Patch", an Irish working class neighborhood and
became a fervent trade unionist through a combination of on-the-job
experience and hours spent in the reading rooms of the city's public
libraries. His trade union career began in the worst year of the
depression, 1933, when he helped organize Cutting Die Lodge 787. By
the time he died he not only chaired the Law Committee, but also was
the moving force in the founding of both the Missouri State Council
and Midwest Conference of Machinists. During the war years Weber
served as worker representative on a number of federal boards and
agencies. His friends in public life included mayors, governors and
senators. But no matter how easily he hobnobbed with politicians, he
remained a plain-spoken trade unionist to the end. In a long and
heart-felt tribute, the St. Louis Labor Tribune described him :as a
man who thought and talked straight" and who deeply believed in
the members' "right to know." Although Weber pioneered
many of the fringe benefits enjoyed by District 9 members, he often
said that if he had achieved nothing more than the district's health
and welfare program he would have considered his life in the labor
movement worthwhile. Statements and resolutions recorded in
the Convention Proceedings clearly indicate the void created by
Weber's passing. More importantly he left a legacy that is still
felt. For many years old-timers in District 9 spoke of him with
reverence, often recalling the early days when he walked the
workers' neighborhoods, literally organizing from door to door.
Fortunately, Weber's legacy both in St. Louis and on the Law
Committee, was carried on for many years by his chief lieutenant and
successor as DBR, Larry Conners. The Selling of a Strike
Fund A number of events made the San Francisco
Convention memorable. For the first time a major presidential
candidate came to directly address and IAM Convention. Adlai
Stevenson, once more running against Eisenhower, received thunderous
applause when he blasted "leap year liberalism" and noted
that "every four years the Republican candidates talk like
Democrats." Another significant first was a group picture of
black delegates that appeared in The Machinist. It included Herman
Blackshear, Miami; F. T. Sanders, Memphis; A. F. Holmes, Atlanta;
Henry Langdon, Montreal; Marcus Todd, Santa Monica and Julius Moon,
Herb Ward, Stephen Glass and John Cummings, Los Angles. In
his keynote address Hayes put the convention's most controversial
issue squarely before the delegates when he urged establishment of a
strike fund. Historically the Grand Lodge paid strike benefits
directly from the general fund. Weekly benefits were minimal--$5.00
in the early years and still as little as $10.00 in the 1950's--but
could push the organization to the edge of bankruptcy during
prolonged strikes and were a steady drain on the general fund even
in the best of times. Arguing the time had come to set up a separate
strike fund, Hayes pointed out that in the first four months of 1956
alone strike donations pointed out that in the first four months of
1956 alone strike donations from the general fund devoured almost 7%
of the IAM's total assets. He claimed that with a separate strike
fund the IAM could pay benefits more in line with the modern
cost-of-living and "not based on a cost-of-living set some
thirty odd years ago." When the Law Committee reported
on the wide range of proposals sent in by almost 100 lodges, it
recommended a weekly strike benefit of $35 payable from a separate
"Grand Lodge Defense and Emergency Fund." The four-hour
debate leading up to a roll call vote clearly indicated that most of
the delegates yearned for some method of assuring a more adequate
system of strike benefits. Many who spoke in favor pointed to lost
strikes and lodges that ended up broke because the international
lacked a strike fund. Some pointed enviously to unions that could
pay decent strike benefits because they did not hesitate to
assess high monthly per capita. Others argued that if employers knew
IAM members were backed by a solvent strike fund the result would be
fewer, not more, strikes. And, of course, the traditional appeals
were made to the spirit of the "Fighting Machinists." The
debate proved most delegates wanted a strike fund that could pay
decent weekly benefits. The rub was in trying to figure out how to
finance it. The Law Committee's proposal included raising minimum
monthly dues from $2.00 to $4.00 and increasing per capita 70¢, of
which 50¢ would be earmarked for the strike fund. Don Burrows, the
powerful DBR of the huge automotive lodge in Chicago, reminded the
convention that the membership had voted down $3.00 minimum dues
following the Kansas City Convention. He bluntly suggested it wasn't
likely they would accept $4.00 minimum dues four years later. Burrows
was right. Though the Law Committee's proposal carried handily in a
roll call of the delegates--3,770 to 2,635--it was vetoed a few
months later--73,000 to 70,000--in a referendum of the membership. A
year later the Executive Council resubmitted the proposal to the
membership without the $4.00 minimum dues. The members then went
along, voting 110,000 to 65,000, to authorize a 70¢ per capita
increase of which 50¢ was earmarked for a separate strike fund
which would pay weekly benefits of $35. |